19.12.13

CHARACTERISTICS OF A CONTRACT OF INSURANCE



1. Aleatory contract: Most contracts are commutative, I,e., each party gives up goods or services presumed to be of equal value. The insurance contract, however, is aleatory ie., the contracting parties know that the amount to be paid by each party is not equal. In the insurance policy, the insured pays the amount of the premium. If he suffers loss he may receive a much larger amount from the company than he paid in premiums, and if he suffers no loss, he will collect nothing.

All gambling contracts are aleatory, but not all aleatory contracts are gambling contracts. Insurance is not gambling as the requirement of insurable interest removes insurance from the category of gambling.
2. Utmost good faith: Most ordinary contracts are bonafide or good faith contracts. Insurance contract, however, are contracts uberrimae fidei, or contracts of utmost good faith. It is a condition of every insurance contract that both the parties should display the utmost good faith towards each other in regard to the contract. This duty continues up to the time the negotiations for the contract are completed and is equally applicable to both the parties. The insured is bound to disclose all material facts known to him but unknown to the insurer. Every fact which is likely to influence the mind of the insurer in deciding whether to accept the proposal or in fixing the rate of premium is material for this purpose. Similarly, the insurer is bound to exercise the same good faith in disclosing the scope of insurance which he is prepared to grant. The duty of disclosure is absolute. It is positive and not negative.
Non-disclosure or misrepresentation of any material fact gives the insurer an option to avoid the contract.
3. Insurable interest: The insured must have an insurable interest in the subject-matter insured. Without such interest the contract will be regarded as a wagering contract and thus void. It means some pecuniary interest in the subject matter insured where he will derive pecuniary benefit from its preservation or will suffer pecuniary loss or damage by the happening of the event insured against. But mere expectation does not constitute insurable interest. Similarly, mutual love and affection is not sufficient to constitute insurable interest.
A person has an insurable interest in property even though he may not be the owner of it, for example, a person who has advanced money on the security of a house has an insurable interest in the house. Again every person has an insurable interest in his own life, since the law presumes that each one desires to remain alive. A person has an insurable interest in the life of another if he can expect to receive pecuniary gain from the continued life of the other person or will suffer financial loss from the latter’s death. Thus, a creditor has an insurable interest in the life of the debtor. A business firm has an insurable interest in the life of an executive or a key employee because his death would inflict a financial loss upon the firm.
A contract of life assurance requires interest at the time of the contract and not at the date of the death. In the case of fire insurance, it is necessary for the assured to prove that he had an insurable interest in the subject matter both at the date of the policy and at the time of loss. In the case of marine insurance, the insurable interest must exist at the time the loss occurs.
4. Indemnity: All contracts of insurance are contracts of indemnity, except those of life assurance and personal accident insurance. It means that the assured in the case of loss against which the policy has been made shall be fully indemnified but never more than fully indemnified. It would be against public policy to allow person who insure their goods to make any profits out of the goods insured.
All policies on property are contracts of indemnity and law would not permit them to be otherwise construed. Thus if the value of the goods insured increases after the date of the policy the insurers are not liable to make good the loss in respect of the increase in value. A contract of insurance ceases to be a contract of indemnity where the insurer promises to pay a fixed sum whether the insured has suffered any loss or not. Contracts of life and accident insurance belong to this class and in their cases indemnity is not the governing principle/
5. Causa proxima: Under the law of insurance, an insured can recover from the insurer for the loss of the subject matter only if it is caused by an event insured against. If there is only one caused of damage or loss, there is no difficulty in fixing the liability of the insurer. But sometimes the loss or damage results on account of a series of causes. In such a case, the principle of causa proxima is applied. By the term proximate cause is not meant the latest, i.e., proximate in time, but the direct, dominant and efficient one. If it is otherwise, the insurer is not liable. Proximate cause is the cause which sets other causes in motion. It is often the earliest in point of time. Where there is insurance against fire, loss caused by smoke arising out of the fire or damage caused by water escaping from pipes, melted in the course of fire is covered by the policy. In such cases the connection between the fire and the loss is so close that the relation of cause and effect is established.
6. Risk must attach: Premium is the consideration for the risk run by the insurance companies and if there is no risk, there should be no premium. It is a general principle of law of insurance that where the insurers have never been on the risk, they cannot be said to have earned the premium. Thus, where a policy is declared to be void an inito or where the policy is avoided before the risk began to run, the assured is entitled to a repayment of the premium that may have been paid. But if once the risk has begun to run the premium cannot be recovered.
7. Mitigation of loss: When the event insured against occurs it is the duty of the insured to take all such steps to mitigate or minimize the loss as if he was uninsured. The insured should not become negligent or inactive in the event of the occurrence merely because the property which is getting damaged is insured. He must instead act like any uninsured prudent man would act under similar circumstances. But his does not mean that while doing his best for the insurer he should risk his own life.
8. Subrogation: The term subrogation literally means substitution i.e., substitution of the insurer in place of the insured in respect of the latter’s rights and remedies. According to the principle of subrogation, the insurer who has agreed to indemnify the assured will, on making good the loss, be entitled to stop into the shoes of assured, I,e., the rights of the assured pass on to the insurer. The doctrine of subrogation is a corollary of the principle of indemnity and so such this principle does not apply to personal assurance. The right of the insurer to be subrogated arises only after the payment of the policy money. The principle of subrogation does not authorize the insurers to sue the third parties in their own names, they can only enforce their rights in the name of the assured.
9. Contribution: There is nothing in law to prevent a person from effecting two or more insurance in respect of the same subject matter. But in case there is loss, the insured will have no right to recover more than the full amount of his actual loss. If he recovers the full amount of the actual loss from one insurer, he will have no right to obtain further payment from the other insurers. In such a case, the principle of contribution will apply according to which the insurer who has paid the insured the full amount of compensation will recover the proportionate contribution from the other insurer. In order to apply the right of contribution between two or more companies, the following factors must exist:
(a) The subject matter of insurance must be the same. It is not necessary that the amount of insurance in each policy should be the same.
(b) The event insured against must be the same.
(c) The insured must be the same.
10. Term of Policy: An insurance policy specifies the term or period of time it covers. Often the nature of the risk against which insurance is sought determines the period or life of the policy. A life insurance policy may cover a specified number of years or the balance of the insured’s life. A contract of fire insurance is normally for a period of one year. A contract of marine insurance may be either for a particular period or for a particular voyage. In case it is for a particular period and the voyage has not come to an end, the liability of the insurer comes to an end on the expiry of the period. If the contract is for a particular voyage, the liability of the insurer comes to an end only after the completion of voyage.

Chapter II CORPORATE STRATEGY

Our principles: We recognize that we must integrate our business values and operations to meet the expectations of our stakeholders. They ...